Skip to main content
Technical proposal SIMD-0610 Review

Prohibit Nonce Account Self-Withdrawals

  1. Idea
  2. Draft
  3. Review
  4. Accept
  5. Implement
  6. Active

Decision brief

Why this proposal matters

Reject a System Program WithdrawNonceAccount instruction when the nonce account and recipient resolve to the same address. After validating the instruction accounts and nonce state, the System Program returns InvalidArgument when the addresses match. Other nonce withdrawals are unchanged.

Source-backed reading aid · source language: EN

Proposal at a glance

What changes

  • Validate the instruction account count and sysvars, require a writable source, and decode the nonce state.
  • Compare the addresses of the nonce account and recipient.
  • If the addresses match, return InvalidArgument.

Stakeholder map

Who is affected

Builders & client teams Medium impact

Because the System Program is a native builtin, validator clients must implement the same feature-gated behavior before activation.

Action may be required
Validators & operators Medium impact

Because the System Program is a native builtin, validator clients must implement the same feature-gated behavior before activation.

Action may be required
Users & stakers Impact unknown

No proposal-specific evidence was found for this group.

Action requirement unknown
Governance & ecosystem Impact unknown

No proposal-specific evidence was found for this group.

Action requirement unknown

Exact source revision

Full proposal document

Source-language document. Technical identifiers and evidence remain unchanged. f1f6c8b05dc2

Summary

Reject a System Program WithdrawNonceAccount instruction when the nonce account and recipient resolve to the same address. After validating the instruction accounts and nonce state, the System Program returns InvalidArgument when the addresses match. Other nonce withdrawals are unchanged.

Motivation

Currently, a System Program WithdrawNonceAccount instruction may use the same account as the nonce account and recipient. Self-withdrawals from uninitialized nonce accounts and zero or partial self-withdrawals from initialized nonce accounts that pass existing checks subtract and then restore the requested lamports, making them no-ops.

A full self-withdrawal from an initialized nonce account that passes the existing checks behaves differently. It deinitializes the nonce account, subtracts its full balance, and restores the lamports to the same account. This leaves a funded, System Program-owned, uninitialized nonce account.

InitializeNonceAccount does not require the nonce account or new authority to sign. Another party can initialize the account with themselves as the new nonce authority and control the retained balance. Initiating the self-withdrawal requires the existing nonce authority, making this an operator footgun.

Self-withdrawals have no known use case. The Stake Program rejects them with InvalidArgument, and SIMD-0609 proposes the same rule for Vote Program withdrawals.

New Terminology

N/A

Detailed Design

System Program WithdrawNonceAccount processes an instruction in this order:

  1. Validate the instruction account count and sysvars, require a writable source, and decode the nonce state.
  2. Compare the addresses of the nonce account and recipient.
  3. If the addresses match, return InvalidArgument.
  4. If the addresses differ, continue existing withdrawal processing.

The new comparison runs before the initialized and uninitialized state branches and their checks for balance, rent, nonce expiration, and required signers. It therefore applies to zero, partial, full-balance, and over-balance withdrawals.

The instruction data and account interface do not change.

Alternatives Considered

  • Reject only full self-withdrawals from initialized nonce accounts. This prevents deinitialization but preserves other no-op self-withdrawals.
  • Skip deinitialization for full self-withdrawals. This makes them no-ops and leaves a special case that future changes must continue to handle safely.
  • Reject self-withdrawals only in the SDK and CLI. Custom transaction builders can bypass client-side checks, so this does not enforce the invariant.
  • Keep the existing behavior. This preserves the footgun.

Impact

After activation, nonce account self-withdrawals that reach the address check fail with InvalidArgument. Non-self withdrawals, instruction encoding, and account lists are unchanged.

Because the System Program is a native builtin, validator clients must implement the same feature-gated behavior before activation.

Security Considerations

N/A

Evidence graph

Related proposals and rollout

One or more sources are unavailable.

Upstream review record

Upstream discussion & review

GitHub review is editorial context, not evidence of on-chain support, voting, or outcome.

PR #610 · merged SIMD-0610: Prohibit Nonce Account Self-Withdrawals 5 comments and reviews · Sep 15, 2026
@simd-botbot

Hello grod220(https://github.com/grod220)! Welcome to the SIMD process. By opening this PR you are affirming that your SIMD has been thoroughly discussed and vetted in the SIMD discussion section(https://github.com/solana-foundation/solana-improvement-documents/discussions/categories/ideas). The SIMD PR section should only be used to submit a final technical specification for review. If your design / idea still needs discussion, please close this PR and create a new discussion here(https://github.com/solana-foundation/solana-improvement-documents/discussions/categories/ideas). This PR requires the following approvals before it can be merged: - At least one approval from a Anza team member: t

GitHub ↗
@simd-botbot

Thanks, topointon-jump(https://github.com/topointon-jump)! ⚠️ Status: Cannot merge yet - Missing approval from: Anza (t-nelson(https://github.com/t-nelson), steviez(https://github.com/steviez), or bw-solana(https://github.com/bw-solana))

GitHub ↗
@simd-botbot

✅ All approvals received! @grod220, you can now merge this by commenting /merge. ✅ Status: Ready to merge

GitHub ↗
@simd-botbot

✅ Merge successful! grod220(https://github.com/grod220)'s PR has been merged.

GitHub ↗

simd.watch community discussion · SIMD-0610

Powered by Giscus · Sign in with GitHub to comment

Community comments load when this section approaches the viewport.

Provenance

Evidence & technical details

Rollout or chain data, source revisions, freshness and integrity.
2

SIMD

Deployment Status

Document lifecycleReview
CategoryCore protocol

Feature Gate not yet created

Exact source revision

Sources & integrity

  • Proposal document pinned_commit_blob
    f1f6c8b05dc205552d3c290a854a438392701107
  • simd-document document · stale · Oct 17, 2026
    f1f6c8b05dc205552d3c290a854a438392701107

One or more sources are unavailable.